$5 / $25
per million tokens in / out: unchanged from Opus 4.8, exactly half of Fable 5's $10/$50
Blog
Claude Opus 5 pricing: same rate card, bigger bills
Opus 5 launched July 24, 2026 at $5 input / $25 output per million tokens: identical to Opus 4.8, half of Fable 5. The rate card is the boring part. The interesting part is what we measured: the same prompt costs 60% more on Opus 5 than on 4.8, because verbosity is a price.
Skip the read: get a measured recommendation in a few quick questions. Run the Stack Finder
+60%
what our identical dashboard prompt actually cost on Opus 5 vs 4.8: $0.1158 vs $0.0724. Same rates, more tokens
$2.50/$12.50
effective batched rate: the Batch API halves both sides for async jobs
Claude Opus 5 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output as of July 2026, unchanged from Opus 4.8 and half of Fable 5's rate. In our measured runs the identical prompt billed about 60% more on Opus 5 than on 4.8, because it writes more tokens.
How much does Claude Opus 5 cost?
$5 per million input tokens, $25 per million output, the same price Opus has carried since the 67% cut at Opus 4.5 in November 2025 (Anthropic pricing). Launch coverage led with the comparison that matters: half the token price of Fable 5. Prompt-cache reads bill at 10% of input; the Batch API takes 50% off both sides.
Want this priced against your own workload? Run the Stack Finder or start with $100 in credits.
The verbosity tax: what the rate card hides
Here is the finding from our metered runs that no rate card shows. We sent the identical one-shot prompt ("build a sortable invoice dashboard, single file") to Opus 5 and Opus 4.8. Same price sheet. Opus 5 wrote 4,610 output tokens where 4.8 wrote 2,877, and billed $0.1158 against $0.0724. Both dashboards worked. Newer models tend to elaborate more, and elaboration is billed: when you forecast an upgrade from 4.8, budget for the token counts to grow even though the rates do not.
The same two tasks on every model we could meter
We sent an identical dashboard-generation prompt and an identical invoice-extraction prompt to every model we can call directly, on July 28, 2026, and recorded the actual bills. No estimates in the measured rows.
| Model | Rate $/M in / out | Dashboard task, measured | Extraction task, measured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | $10 / $50 | $0.1462 | $0.0148* |
| Claude Opus 5 | $5 / $25 | $0.1158 | $0.0114 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | $5 / $25 | $0.0724 | $0.0093 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | $2 / $10 | $0.0410 | $0.0037 |
| Pareto | at cost | $0.0196 | $0.0018 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | $1 / $5 | $0.0162 | $0.0016 |
Measured 2026-07-28, one shot each, default settings, list prices. *Fable extraction is same-tokens list math from our earlier run; every other cell is a metered bill. Prompts published verbatim in the Fable 5 breakdown. All outputs completed the task; quality-per-dollar comparisons need the benchmark receipts, not this table alone.
Opus 5 vs Fable 5: is half price the bargain it sounds like?
For coding and agentic work, mostly yes: that is why Anthropic positions Opus as the default and Fable as the specialist. For the hardest reasoning, Fable holds an edge the premium pays for. The pattern that wastes the least money is neither loyalty: default to the cheaper tier, escalate on failure. Our Fable 5 alternatives breakdown covers the decision in detail.
Opus 5 pricing questions, answered
Did Opus 5 change Anthropic's pricing?
No. It launched at the same $5/$25 that Opus 4.8 carried, holding the price set by the 67% cut at Opus 4.5 in November 2025. The premium tier above it, Fable 5 at $10/$50, is where the ladder changed in 2026.
Why do my Opus 5 bills exceed my Opus 4.8 bills at the same rates?
Verbosity. In our measured runs Opus 5 wrote about 60% more output tokens on the identical prompt. Tighter max-token limits and instructions to be concise claw much of that back.
Is Opus 5 cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol?
On output, yes: $25 versus $30 per million, with input tied at $5. On real bills, token counts differ by model and prompt, which is why we publish measured task costs rather than rate-card math alone.
What is the cheapest way to run Opus 5?
Batch what can wait (50% off both sides, so $2.50/$12.50 effective) and cache what repeats (reads at 10% of input). Both discounts stack with concise-output instructions, which matter more on Opus 5 than they did on 4.8.
Not sure which model fits?
The Stack Finder asks a few quick questions about your workload and gives you a straight recommendation. No account required.
Opus-class results at 1–45¢ on the dollar. Verify it.
Buy Pareto API credits